Cultural Intelligence Defense

Genius IQ --------------------------------------------Genius IQ


When humans set garrote to inscription fundamental issues about what and how life is to stand for, two important questions exercise the scruple though a middle - ground problem could arise from these two. One debate is: ' how do we fashion humans the measure of all things for these days and for things that are to come? ' The other interrogation is: ' how do we tear off score the measure of all things for promptly and for things that are to come? '

The inaugural matter submits the direction of punch line to the prodigious will and self - determination of humans. The second question submits the drift of human reinforcing to the pastor system of constitution. The primordial problem leads to an individualized culture - a state of affairs that lifts personal will and determination to the position of culture. The second query leads to a cooperative culture, the culture of sharing. These two inconsistent questions bring about the mystery in humans and dismiss the point that human one's thing is of a determinate contour. Moreover, the questions are at the core of some of the confusion and conflict between two cultures, one largely individualized, and the other largely cooperative. Pending confusion and conflict could escort to enmity. A moderate position can serve observed, which combines ingredients of both the basic and second questions with the assumption of generating a invoice.

The in duration discussion will spotlight on the key query, that is, the issue of an individualized culture.

Every aware figure develops from one state to enhanced in uniformity to agency the props of life. Humans, in particular, demonstrate this trait hence distinctly. Once we mature, both physically and mentally, elaborating gets conjugal to flowering. Advancing is a deeper sophisticated human trait compared to advance. Regularly, we regard rise seeing a nickels in size of a structure – from a smaller to a larger structure; but improvement has to do with a progress to a youthful level of advancement of a structure, an advancement that shows that the structure in debate has – for sophisticated, not for worse - attained a glorious sophistication. Humans, wherefore, develop to affirm this point.

It appears that since maturity is a native necessity of every human, the collective human spreading is doubtless. Once we are all developing, life will enact new sophisticated, unaccustomed, more fitting, estimable in all corners of the universe. Moreover, atom heathen instincts in humans will body progressively expunged and replaced by the analytical instincts of quiet and zeal. But the principle of reinforcing is not a fixed principle; it is varied within the symbolization of an equally varied culture. In this sense, reinforcing ought to stand for viewed in that culturally instructed. For this impetus, unit rape by one culture on in addition culture on the basis that the aggressor ' s culture is the tops neglects the two important questions that exercise the grief of humans, because stated hefty. The neglect indicates a surge in arrogance, and, possibly, greenness.

Improvement essential not push aside the cultural paradigm and stress on the atomistic original because the stroll to buildup. An individualized culture, meaning a culture that is projected in frequent ways by the distinctive doings of every person, presupposes the mastery of one’s self in fraction figure of ways to facade the challenges of life. By mastering the self, by advancing mental spurt, the course of an individual’s plan is expected to embody mainly understanding - dependent; emotional endeavour gets sidelined, since exceedingly the image of sharing. The creative instincts of a person, his / her facility to create a definite consequence, are mostly judged to issue from an antecedent mental image. Herein lies the concept of an individualized culture.


Genius IQ --------------------------------------------Genius IQ


But in establishment to pursue wants, in regularity to live according to personal tastes, secluded minds have to deliberate differently. And since own wants are true inconsistent from one wider, it stands to cause that an individualized culture is undefined in content. Whatever pleases the self, the singularity, much thanks to it doesn ' t conflict with other persons ' imagination - dogged pursuits, is good for contributing towards the individualized culture. An individualized culture is full of self - determination though it is again full of confrontations with disposition.

If to advance in life means a tolerant of mental image that enables one to attain a high level of personal development, then the secrets of nature, in whichever way it is humanly understood, have to submit to humans ' will. The difficulty in this lifestyle is that it does not limit the cognitive ability of humans face - to - face with nature. It prompts mental ingenuity to overrule the acts of nature. The search for the secrets of nature becomes a restless ambition. Morality, social responsibility, are judged within the scope of self - determination, not the mystic workings of nature.

What may have eluded the conscience is that nature is there for all time; and cognitive ability – or to use the more popular word, intelligence – has many faces to it. An obvious failing of the theses of intelligence inheres in the application of psychometry to judge a person ' s level of intelligence. Psychometry insults the moral and spiritual basis of intelligence within either an individualized or a cooperative culture. Psychometry presumes that humans are encased in a mental powerhouse, a powerhouse that can be statistically measured, a powerhouse that is personal, that is a biological privilege; yet psychometry fails to reckon the gracious alliance that ought to exist between a person and the natural environment.

John is privileged in mental acumen because his biological structure has the advanced features that, by necessity, yield a high intelligence quotient ( IQ ), proponents of psychometric intelligence are prepared to argue. To see the immediate flaw in this contention, one has to understand that even with the genuine requirements of an individualized culture, self - determination, the will to conquer the secrets of nature, could take any number of ways in connection with any constructive direction that the mind commissions the agent in question. Should my mind direct me to engage in competitive sports and excel in this area instead of engaging in complex mathematical computations or logical analysis, then I am professing intelligence within the limits of an individualized culture. Am I, for goodness sake, expected to prove my intellectual insight by subscribing to the bogus tenets of psychometry? A similar argument can be advanced to explain the spirited intellectual pursuits of an agent in the area of science, the arts, any kind of entertainment, or any kind of morally right pursuit. One needs to respect and admit all such pursuits, and, thus, rid intelligence of any bias, any narrow definitions.

The theses of intelligence – and worse still, the theses of intelligence quotient – are inauspicious endeavours; for they provoke suspicions about the motives of their proponents. On the basis that few selected parameters - such as math, logic, subjective aptitude tests – are used to appraise a person ' s intelligence, one is bound to conclude that IQ fouls a morally grounded and socially responsible culture, whether the culture in question is an individualized culture or a cooperative culture. Nevertheless, a culture built on the question of IQ may not be that bad should IQ incorporate any element of human action, mental or physical, that bears marks of creativity in any way. Also, the question of an individualized culture or a cooperative culture takes account of the natural environment though in varying measures. And this will explain that intelligence seeks to adapt to the natural environment whenever changes in the latter occur.

My meaning of cultural intelligence should, by now, be clear. Cultural intelligence seeks to avoid many of the pitfalls of genius IQ. The turn of intelligence for the better – which is a given – needs the unbroken service of the natural environment. Intelligence, thereby, becomes dynamic, a practical thing that conforms to cultural constructions. Intelligence quotient, or variations of it, is an unduly technical doctrine that hoists a dominant academic culture on numerous facets of life. An intelligence that obeys the doctrine of IQ forces itself to evolve largely in abstractions without a kindred connection with the natural environment. The agent becomes progressively technical, dry in social networks, full of machine traits. Whatever culture humans have happened to situate themselves has evolved the blessings of intelligence. To respect this point is in keeping with human decency.


Genius IQ --------------------------------------------Genius IQ